"If you know where exactly a perpetrator touched something, then yeah, you could swab something. But most of the time we don't know so it's better if you have something that is cloth or fabric or a rope, some sort of ligature, bricks and rocks, things like that, wooden boards, I would always recommend the M-Vac™ versus swabbing just because I've seen the results! It's not just a theoretical thing. I know what it can do. I know you can get some pretty amazing results using M-Vac™. So the more I use it the more I'm a proponent of it for sure." --Suzanna Ryan, Laboratory Director/Forensic DNA Analyst, Pure Gold Forensics
With what types of evidence has the M-Vac™ been successful or where does it work well? The obvious answer is porous or rough surfaces, but it also works well on some surprising substrates. It has yielded meaningful, third-party data from these evidence types.
* Denotes that the item has yielded meaningful profiles in casework.
† Indicates the item was analyzed in university research.
¤ Means the item was studied by either the FBI or an independent agency or lab, either for research or validation purposes.
M-Vac™ Strengths:
|
<< Back: Validations | Next: Who Benefits >> |